Ah - you weren’t using the ones in the directories [Laughing]
I’ve no idea why the directory structure is like that for mingw…
My guess is mingw is also available in Linux … as a cross compiling toolchain I believe. It would need to have the lib+include file in the different directory (otherwise it would clash with the system ones).
hello,
yes mingw is available in mingw
but for headers, i don’t think that they should be different!, because
the function definitions and structures are the same
just library files should be different
???-??-?? ??:?? +??:?? ???, mr_tawan <mr_tawan at hotmail.com>:>
MrTAToad wrote:
Ah - you weren’t using the ones in the directories [Laughing]
I’ve no idea why the directory structure is like that for mingw…
My guess is mingw is also available in Linux … as a cross compiling
toolchain I believe. It would need to have the lib+include file in the
different directory (otherwise it would clash with the system ones).
Yes. I definitely think there is something fishy about the package. Seems that in addition to the mingw dev distributables it includes some old version(?) of includes and visual studio libs.