How about TinyGL? (Not that Iāve used it myself yetā¦)
http://www.stud.enst.fr/~bellard/TinyGL.html
i will check this out, but all stuff with GL in name seems to beā¦
slow.
Well, not if itās h/w accelerated, of course, but other than that, you
seem to be quite right.
However, TinyGL seems to be optimized specifically for software
rendering. It even takes the liberty of not being 100% OpenGL compatible,
mainly for the sake of speed.
hmmā¦ tommorow i start my weekend so my intuition tells me that i will
have to
write this by myself. thanks for help anyway.
Thatās quite some work if you want it real fastā¦ Even more work if itās
supposed to look good AND be real fast.
You could probably rip the texturing code from some 3D game from the
early days of h/w acceleration, back when software rendering still had to
be playable. (Several of those engines are now GPLed.)
There might be some interesting code in Quake, Quake II, maybe also the
floor/ceiling texturing from Doom. (Although I think the ZDoom code is
faster - itās probably the fastest source port around, and itās optimized
for current CPUs.)
[ā¦]
Anyway, Iāve been using Mandrake and XFree86 4.0.x on machines with
G400, Rage128/Mach64 and Rage Pro 128 and never seen anything like
that. Of course, that might just be because of my huge collection of
modelines.
i have riva zx
thatās why software rendering on my pc runs faster then ogl
It canāt be that bad, can it!?
and i am going to move to G450 or some kind of gfrc.
Iām very happy with the G400/Eizo F980 combo, but I would probably go for
a GeForce based card unless I really was going to use 1600x1200+
resolutions. GeForce 2 is much faster than the G400 and G450, and the
GF3 should be ever faster. (The G450 isnāt faster than the G400, but has
a better secondary output. In fact, the G450 is sometimes slightly slower
because of the half width, double speed bus.)
The major advantage or the Matrox cards (and ATI cards to some extent) is
that they happily generate high quality video signals at resolutions
beyond 1600x1200, which is not the case with any GF based cards.
(Integrated crap RAMDAC in the GF chips - silly nVidiaā¦) I have a
machine with a GF2 card and a good 19" monitor, and in fact, the image
was sharper with the old Permedia-2 based cardā¦
Oh, a G400 does run Quake III pretty well, so whatās the big deal?
//David Olofson ā Programmer, Reologica Instruments AB
.- M A I A -------------------------------------------------.
| Multimedia Application Integration Architecture |
| A Free/Open Source Plugin API for Professional Multimedia |
----------------------------> http://www.linuxdj.com/maia -' .- David Olofson -------------------------------------------. | Audio Hacker - Open Source Advocate - Singer - Songwriter |
-------------------------------------> http://olofson.net -'On Friday 26 October 2001 17:08, firefox wrote: