Hi,
Are there any plain C++ wrappers for SDL?
At the SDL site I saw 6 libs, but they’re all much more then just a wrapper.
Olaf van der Spek
Almere, Holland
http://xccu.sf.net/
Hi,
Are there any plain C++ wrappers for SDL?
At the SDL site I saw 6 libs, but they’re all much more then just a wrapper.
Olaf van der Spek
Almere, Holland
http://xccu.sf.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Are there any plain C++ wrappers for SDL?
At the SDL site I saw 6 libs, but they’re all much more then just a
wrapper.
You really don’t need a wrapper to use SDL with C++, and I guess that
creating a library that is so thin that the only thing it does is adding
member functions to SDL surfaces is too boring to even bother
By the way, creating an “SDL” class which contains the equivalent of
functions like SDL_SetVideoMode() isn’t really logical because it would
confuse the global nature of these functions, so changing SDL surfaces (and
maybe events) to be more “class-like” is really the only thing such a thin
C++ library could do.
cu,
Nicolai
Olaf van der Spek
Almere, Holland
http://xccu.sf.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQE+lZUmsxPozBga0lwRAh2PAJYoMduXckXe3owQyTnTyu7rezLVAJ0XYwxm
Yxxseq2TnZVblaOznNcXSg==
=grVL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----On Thursday 10 April 2003 17:49, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1Hi,
Are there any plain C++ wrappers for SDL?
At the SDL site I saw 6 libs, but they’re all much more then just a
wrapper.You really don’t need a wrapper to use SDL with C++, and I guess that
Of course it’s not needed, but it’s quite handy.
creating a library that is so thin that the only thing it does is adding
member functions to SDL surfaces is too boring to even botherBy the way, creating an “SDL” class which contains the equivalent of
functions like SDL_SetVideoMode() isn’t really logical because it would
confuse the global nature of these functions, so changing SDL surfaces
(and
maybe events) to be more “class-like” is really the only thing such a thin
C++ library could do.Actually, the reason I asked for this was automatic reference counting of
SDL_Surface to allow the user not having to call SDL_FreeSurface.
Although not very important, it’s a nice feature to have.cu,
NicolaiOlaf van der Spek
Almere, Holland
http://xccu.sf.net/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)iD4DBQE+lZUmsxPozBga0lwRAh2PAJYoMduXckXe3owQyTnTyu7rezLVAJ0XYwxm
Yxxseq2TnZVblaOznNcXSg==
=grVL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
SDL mailing list
SDL at libsdl.org
http://www.libsdl.org/mailman/listinfo/sdl----- Original Message -----
From: prefect_@gmx.net (Nicolai Haehnle)
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: [SDL] C++ wrappers?
On Thursday 10 April 2003 17:49, Olaf van der Spek wrote: