“configure error: *** version 1.2.0 not found”
The script tells me, that i should check sdl-configure.
sdl-config --prefix
tells me that the path is set to /usr/local
More importantly, what’s the output of:
sdl-config --version
That will probably tell you that you have a rogue SDL install somewhere.
See ya!
-Sam Lantinga, Lead Programmer, Loki Entertainment Software
Ok,
now i enterd sdl-config --version in the linux console and get this:
$ sdl-config --version
1.2.0
$
Best Regards
Oliver C.
Sam Lantinga wrote:> > “configure error: *** version 1.2.0 not found”
The script tells me, that i should check sdl-configure.
sdl-config --prefix
tells me that the path is set to /usr/localMore importantly, what’s the output of:
sdl-config --version
That will probably tell you that you have a rogue SDL install somewhere.See ya!
-Sam Lantinga, Lead Programmer, Loki Entertainment Software
Catonga writes:
:
sdl-config --version
:1.2.0
:
:Best Regards
: Oliver C.
:
This happens to me with SDL too. You can usually get around it (and
get a clean compile) with ./configure --disable-sdltest.
My problems are with dl, or libtool, or something. I’ll post them in
another thread.–
Tony Reed
<@Tony_Reed>
Thanks that helped compiling it.
But i found one very stange behaviour.
When i compiled it with make i get an error that said something like
that:
SDLlib.so -> can’t find libartsc.so
I searched that library and found it in my /usr/local/kde/lib
directory.
I solved the problem by adding that dir to my ld.so.conf file and
starting ldconfig.
Now my question is: Why KDE?
Why is SDLlib needing a library from KDE?
I thought SDL is platform independant.
Best Regards
Oliver C.
Tony Reed wrote:> Catonga <@Catonga> writes:
:
:1.2.0
:
:Best Regards
: Oliver C.
:This happens to me with SDL too. You can usually get around it (and
get a clean compile) with ./configure --disable-sdltest.My problems are with dl, or libtool, or something. I’ll post them in
another thread.–
Tony Reed