G’day,
what are the parameters for the configure script to create sdl dll’s instead
of a static library ? I tried the --enable-win32-dll flag but to no avail.
Any hints ?
Cheers,
cross.
G’day,
what are the parameters for the configure script to create sdl dll’s instead
of a static library ? I tried the --enable-win32-dll flag but to no avail.
Any hints ?
Cheers,
cross.
G’day,
what are the parameters for the configure script to create sdl dll’s instead
of a static library ? I tried the --enable-win32-dll flag but to no avail.
Any hints ?
Erm, libtool doesn’t create DLL’s the way I need them generated at the moment.
I’m using Visual C++ under windows to create them.
Anybody want to fix this?
Somehow libtool detects that there are unresolved symbols, even though I
link with all the proper Win32 stub libraries, and so does not generate
any DLL at all. If I tell libtool to ignore unresolved symbols, it creates
a DLL with a name based on the version numbers (something like: SDL-1-0-0-0-0-1.dll)
See ya!
-Sam Lantinga (slouken at devolution.com)
Lead Programmer, Loki Entertainment Software–
“Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature”
– Rich Kulawiec