MinGW SDL2 build generates libSDL2-2-0-0.dll

SDL Development
#1

Is this the expected, as from my last mercurial pull (granted, it was a
little while ago) just build libSDL2.dll, and it doesn’t make sense (to me
at least) that we’d start using build versions in the dll file.

Can anyone confirm if this is the expected behaviour?

Thanks,
-Alex

#2

Nope, this is a side effect of the autotools upgrade. I’ll add that to my
TODO list to fix.On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Alex Barry <alex.barry at gmail.com> wrote:

Is this the expected, as from my last mercurial pull (granted, it was a
little while ago) just build libSDL2.dll, and it doesn’t make sense (to me
at least) that we’d start using build versions in the dll file.

Can anyone confirm if this is the expected behaviour?

Thanks,
-Alex

SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org

#3

Thanks Sam :)On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Sam Lantinga wrote:

Nope, this is a side effect of the autotools upgrade. I’ll add that to my
TODO list to fix.

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Alex Barry <@Alex_Barry> wrote:

Is this the expected, as from my last mercurial pull (granted, it was a
little while ago) just build libSDL2.dll, and it doesn’t make sense (to me
at least) that we’d start using build versions in the dll file.

Can anyone confirm if this is the expected behaviour?

Thanks,
-Alex

SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org

SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org