OS X Framework version for SDL2_image, SDL2_mixer

With SDL 2 on nearing its release it should be a good idea to fix such
minor issue like OS X Framework version for OS XSDL2_image, SDL2_mixer etc.
Should be 2.0.0 instead of 1.2.13.

I debated that. There isn’t technically any reason to bump the versions to
2.0, but I guess it makes sense to match the SDL version.

Thoughts?On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Alexey Petruchik wrote:

With SDL 2 on nearing its release it should be a good idea to fix such
minor issue like OS X Framework version for OS XSDL2_image, SDL2_mixer etc.
Should be 2.0.0 instead of 1.2.13.


SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org

Well SDL_image behaves differently when compiled against SDL2 or SDL, so I
think an updated name make sense there.
Not sure about the others, maybe consistency is something good to have?
VittorioOn Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Sam Lantinga wrote:

I debated that. There isn’t technically any reason to bump the versions
to 2.0, but I guess it makes sense to match the SDL version.

Thoughts?

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Alexey Petruchik wrote:

With SDL 2 on nearing its release it should be a good idea to fix such
minor issue like OS X Framework version for OS XSDL2_image, SDL2_mixer etc.
Should be 2.0.0 instead of 1.2.13.


SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org


SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org

Its a bit counterintuitive when framework called SDL2_image has version 1.2.13 :slight_smile:

25.02.2013, ? 7:41, Sam Lantinga ???(?):> I debated that. There isn’t technically any reason to bump the versions to 2.0, but I guess it makes sense to match the SDL version.

Thoughts?

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Alexey Petruchik wrote:

With SDL 2 on nearing its release it should be a good idea to fix such minor issue like OS X Framework version for OS XSDL2_image, SDL2_mixer etc. Should be 2.0.0 instead of 1.2.13.


SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org


SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org

Yea bump the version to be consistent if nothing else. Anyone wanting to
use them with SDL2 is going to be expecting that and info on whether it is
compatible or not.

  • Swyped from my droid.

Its a bit counterintuitive when framework called SDL2_image has version
1.2.13 :slight_smile:

25.02.2013, ? 7:41, Sam Lantinga ???(?):

I debated that. There isn’t technically any reason to bump the versions
to 2.0, but I guess it ma…On Feb 25, 2013 10:36 AM, wrote:


SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org

Seems that you fixed SDL_mixer, SDL_image, … for windows, debian and
others but forgot to fix version number for OS X Frameworks.On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Jonathan Greig wrote:

Yea bump the version to be consistent if nothing else. Anyone wanting to
use them with SDL2 is going to be expecting that and info on whether it is
compatible or not.

  • Swyped from my droid.

On Feb 25, 2013 10:36 AM, wrote:

Its a bit counterintuitive when framework called SDL2_image has version
1.2.13 :slight_smile:

25.02.2013, ? 7:41, Sam Lantinga ???(?):

I debated that. There isn’t technically any reason to bump the versions
to 2.0, but I guess it ma…


SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org


SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org