# SDL 1.3 Windows builds available. (x86 / x86-64)

**URL:** <https://discourse.libsdl.org/t/sdl-1-3-windows-builds-available-x86-x86-64/17655>\
**Category:** SDL Development\
**Created:** [September 30, 2010, 5:55am UTC](https://discourse.libsdl.org/t/sdl-1-3-windows-builds-available-x86-x86-64/17655 "2010-09-30T05:55:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sockerdrickan](https://discourse.libsdl.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/4af34b/32.png) [@Sockerdrickan](https://discourse.libsdl.org/u/Sockerdrickan)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2010, 5:55am UTC](https://discourse.libsdl.org/t/sdl-1-3-windows-builds-available-x86-x86-64/17655/1 "2010-09-30T05:55:49Z")

</div>

Hello  
SDL 1.3 snapshot build for Windows can be downloaded from my website [www.amyto.com](http://www.amyto.com)

Cheers! :)------------------------  
[www.amyto.com](http://www.amyto.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Edward\_Byard](https://discourse.libsdl.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/e/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Edward\_Byard](https://discourse.libsdl.org/u/Edward_Byard)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2010, 1:08pm UTC](https://discourse.libsdl.org/t/sdl-1-3-windows-builds-available-x86-x86-64/17655/2 "2010-10-01T13:08:40Z")

</div>

Cool - any chance you can do the same with SDL\_image and SDL\_mixer, and build them against the SDL 1.3 headers?

This should already be done to save everyone the trouble…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sockerdrickan](https://discourse.libsdl.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/4af34b/32.png) [@Sockerdrickan](https://discourse.libsdl.org/u/Sockerdrickan)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2010, 6:36am UTC](https://discourse.libsdl.org/t/sdl-1-3-windows-builds-available-x86-x86-64/17655/3 "2010-11-29T06:36:01Z")

</div>

ebyard wrote:

> Cool - any chance you can do the same with SDL\_image and SDL\_mixer, and build them against the SDL 1.3 headers?
> 
> This should already be done to save everyone the trouble…

Sorry I am doing strictly SDL 1.3 builds.

Revision 4916 has been built for Windows x64!------------------------  
[www.amyto.com](http://www.amyto.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sockerdrickan](https://discourse.libsdl.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/4af34b/32.png) [@Sockerdrickan](https://discourse.libsdl.org/u/Sockerdrickan)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2011, 2:25pm UTC](https://discourse.libsdl.org/t/sdl-1-3-windows-builds-available-x86-x86-64/17655/4 "2011-01-23T14:25:25Z")

</div>

SDL 1.3 Revision 5076 has been built for Windows x64!  
www.amyto.com------------------------  
[www.amyto.com](http://www.amyto.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Michael\_Menegakis](https://discourse.libsdl.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/f04885/32.png) [@Michael\_Menegakis](https://discourse.libsdl.org/u/Michael_Menegakis)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2011, 4:14pm UTC](https://discourse.libsdl.org/t/sdl-1-3-windows-builds-available-x86-x86-64/17655/5 "2011-01-23T16:14:34Z")

</div>

Most open source projects are currently easily compilable for win64  
with mingw-w64 project’s binary distributions. This usually the case  
for autotools projects. If an autotools project has had its configure  
script generated with an old libtool it may need an autoreconf with a  
new libtool installed. This is usually easier to be done on a  
virtualbox running linux since it’s appears hell to install autotools  
on msys.On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Sockerdrickan wrote:

> SDL 1.3 Revision 5076 has been built for Windows x64!  
> [www.amyto.com](http://www.amyto.com)
> 
> * * *
> 
> [www.amyto.com](http://www.amyto.com)
> 
> * * *
> 
> SDL mailing list  
> SDL at [lists.libsdl.org](http://lists.libsdl.org)  
> [http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org](http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sockerdrickan](https://discourse.libsdl.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/4af34b/32.png) [@Sockerdrickan](https://discourse.libsdl.org/u/Sockerdrickan)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2011, 5:49pm UTC](https://discourse.libsdl.org/t/sdl-1-3-windows-builds-available-x86-x86-64/17655/6 "2011-02-20T17:49:52Z")

</div>

SDL 1.3 Revision 5356 has been built for Windows x64!------------------------  
[www.amyto.com](http://www.amyto.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ginkgobitter](https://discourse.libsdl.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/7ba0ec/32.png) [@ginkgobitter](https://discourse.libsdl.org/u/ginkgobitter)\
**Post date:** [July 31, 2011, 12:32pm UTC](https://discourse.libsdl.org/t/sdl-1-3-windows-builds-available-x86-x86-64/17655/7 "2011-07-31T12:32:59Z")

</div>

I built x86 and x64 windows binaries of SDL 1.3 Revision 5581 and, since there seemed to be interest in it, SDL\_image 1.2.11 (including all supported file formats) against it…

Unfortunately I gave up on SDL\_mixer - getting SDL\_image with all the dependencies up was enough of a hassle and SDL\_mixer references even more libraries (for windows these would be fluidsynth, libmikmod, timidity, ogg, flac, smpeg (and/or libmad?!?), modplug) and some of those pull in even more. I just couldn’t take it anymore, so I decided to just go with a current build of OpenAL Soft instead.

I’d be interested in what formats you are actually using for SDL\_image and SDL\_mixer. I’m sure there are some that aren’t actually used by anyone. As an example - jbig for tiff… seriously?!? Is someone working on an SDL fax machine? Being able to limit what has to be built would make everything a lot easier [Wink]

The downloads can be found here ([http://ginkgobitter.dyndns.org](http://ginkgobitter.dyndns.org)).