Hello everyone,
Does SDL_AddEventWatch offer any kind of ordering guarantee? For instance,
if I call SDL_AddEventWatch two times in a row, will the event watches be
called in order, reverse order or in random?
The same question applies to SDL_SetEventFilter.
Thanks,
Stefanos
All filters or watches are run in reverse order. The last set will be called first.On 17 ??? 2014, at 7:38 ?.?., “Stefanos A.” wrote:
Hello everyone,
Does SDL_AddEventWatch offer any kind of ordering guarantee? For instance, if I call SDL_AddEventWatch two times in a row, will the event watches be called in order, reverse order or in random?
The same question applies to SDL_SetEventFilter.
Thanks,
Stefanos
SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org
Thanks, this fits with what I am seeing. It would be nice if this was
mentioned in the documentation (wiki or in the source.)
2014-02-18 13:47 GMT+01:00 :> All filters or watches are run in reverse order. The last set will be
called first.
On 17 ??? 2014, at 7:38 ?.?., “Stefanos A.” <@Stefanos_A> wrote:
Hello everyone,
Does SDL_AddEventWatch offer any kind of ordering guarantee? For
instance, if I call SDL_AddEventWatch two times in a row, will the event
watches be called in order, reverse order or in random?
The same question applies to SDL_SetEventFilter.
Thanks,
Stefanos
SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org
SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org