SDL IMAGE, SDL TTF and SDL MIXER compatible with SDL 1.3

SDL Development
1

Is it possible to use SDL image, SDL ttf and SDL mixer with SDL 1.3 ?[/quote]

2

SDL_Image has to be recompiled against the .h files for SDL 1.3, since the
format of SDL_Surface has changed, but then it works fine. Not sure about
the other two.________________________________
From: mike@neogen2.com (MikeDomingues)
To: sdl at lists.libsdl.org
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 6:04:59 AM
Subject: [SDL] SDL IMAGE, SDL TTF and SDL MIXER compatible with SDL 1.3

Is it possible to use SDL image, SDL ttf and SDL mixer with SDL 1.3 ?[/quote]

3

Yes, they all work with SDL 1.3 if they are recompiled with it. I
think a couple of them have fixes in subversion, but they’re otherwise
fine.On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Mason Wheeler wrote:

SDL_Image has to be recompiled against the .h files for SDL 1.3, since the
format of SDL_Surface has changed, but then it works fine.? Not sure about
the other two.

From: MikeDomingues
To: sdl at lists.libsdl.org
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 6:04:59 AM
Subject: [SDL] SDL IMAGE, SDL TTF and SDL MIXER compatible with SDL 1.3

Is it possible to use SDL image, SDL ttf and SDL mixer with SDL 1.3
?[/quote]

SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org

–
-Sam Lantinga, Founder and President, Galaxy Gameworks LLC

4

Sam Lantinga wrote:> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Mason Wheeler wrote:

SDL_Image has to be recompiled against the .h files for SDL 1.3,
since the format of SDL_Surface has changed, but then it works
fine. Not sure about the other two.

Yes, they all work with SDL 1.3 if they are recompiled with it. I
think a couple of them have fixes in subversion, but they’re otherwise
fine.

Hmm, would we not want to increment the major version if compiled against
SDL 1.3 to allow parallel installation with SDL 1.2 compiled versions
still used by old (i.e. closed source) applications?

–
Alan.

5

Yeah, the support for coexisting installations is planned, but not in yet.On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Alan Swanson wrote:

Sam Lantinga wrote:

On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Mason Wheeler wrote:

SDL_Image has to be recompiled against the .h files for SDL 1.3,
since the format of SDL_Surface has changed, but then it works
fine. ?Not sure about the other two.

Yes, they all work with SDL 1.3 if they are recompiled with it. ?I
think a couple of them have fixes in subversion, but they’re otherwise
fine.

Hmm, would we not want to increment the major version if compiled against
SDL 1.3 to allow parallel installation with SDL 1.2 compiled versions
still used by old (i.e. closed source) applications?

–
Alan.

SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org

–
-Sam Lantinga, Founder and President, Galaxy Gameworks LLC

6

Sorry, I’m senior using SDl and the UNiX terminal. I use SL 10.6 and want to use SDL 1.13 because has problems using 1.12. I download the source code of SDL and compile it directly. After that i download SDL_ttf, SDL_mixer and SDL_image. And compile these three sourcecodes without changing anything. I did something wrong ???

7

No, these three a completely compatible with SDL 1.3 with no changes needed.On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 8:46 AM, memmaker650 wrote:

Sorry, I’m senior using SDl and the UNiX terminal. I use SL 10.6 and want to
use SDL 1.13 because has problems using 1.12. I download the source code of
SDL and compile it directly. After that i download SDL_ttf, SDL_mixer and
SDL_image. And compile these three sourcecodes without changing anything. I
did something wrong ???

SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org

–
-Sam Lantinga, Founder and President, Galaxy Gameworks LLC