Universal binaries missing?

Since the CVS to SVN migration, it seems that the universal framework
builds have disappeared. Can we get those back up somewhere? I don’t
really want to deal with building SDL_image, SDL_ttf, etc. and their
dependencies if I don’t have to.

-bob

Since the CVS to SVN migration, it seems that the universal framework
builds have disappeared. Can we get those back up somewhere? I don’t
really want to deal with building SDL_image, SDL_ttf, etc. and their
dependencies if I don’t have to.

They’re still there, just in http://www.libsdl.org/tmp

See ya,
-Sam Lantinga, Senior Software Engineer, Blizzard Entertainment

Sorry to be a dingbat but which one is it? Is this a binary or is it a “all you
have to do is give it quick compile (in theory)” type binary?> They’re still there, just in http://www.libsdl.org/tmp

See ya,
-Sam Lantinga, Senior Software Engineer, Blizzard Entertainment

I should have said “which file is it?” I’ve DL’d several
and I can’t find a SDL.framework and developer
stuff for intel osx.

thanks

I should have said “which file is it?” I’ve DL’d several
and I can’t find a SDL.framework and developer
stuff for intel osx.

http://www.libsdl.org/tmp/SDL.dmg

Please remember that this is PRERELEASE code, not for redistribution.

Thanks!
-Sam Lantinga, Senior Software Engineer, Blizzard Entertainment

I want to make sure that I completely understand: anything that is
prerelease may NOT be used in a commercial product and is NOT subject to the
LGPL…is this correct?

Thanks,

Ryan

“Sam Lantinga” wrote in message
news:E1FdjUP-0003rT-KH at twomix.devolution.com…>> I should have said “which file is it?” I’ve DL’d several

and I can’t find a SDL.framework and developer
stuff for intel osx.

http://www.libsdl.org/tmp/SDL.dmg

Please remember that this is PRERELEASE code, not for redistribution.

Thanks!
-Sam Lantinga, Senior Software Engineer, Blizzard Entertainment

Hello !

I want to make sure that I completely understand: anything that is
prerelease may NOT be used in a commercial product and is NOT subject to
the LGPL…is this correct?

No. The only reason why you should not use SDL from SVN
for commercial releases that it is BETA and may be buggy.
The testing peroid of the stable SDL version is much much longer.

CU

Good to know. Thanks for the quick response!

“Torsten Giebl” wrote in message
news:1488.141.99.122.11.1147269263.squirrel at mail.syntheticsw.com…> Hello !

I want to make sure that I completely understand: anything that is
prerelease may NOT be used in a commercial product and is NOT subject to
the LGPL…is this correct?

No. The only reason why you should not use SDL from SVN
for commercial releases that it is BETA and may be buggy.
The testing peroid of the stable SDL version is much much longer.

CU