‘sdl2.m4’ provides a useful macro for locating SDL in configure scripts. However, it never bothers looking for the SDL2.framework. Given that the official SDL development libraries release for Mac OS X comes in a framework, I updated the sdl2.m4 from my project to also look for the framework version of SDL (when sdl2-config and pkg-config fail, only under Mac OS X).
Is this a change worth mirroring in the SDL sources? I can provide a patch for sdl2.m4. I mainly wanted to see if this something other people actually want or need.
Thanks,
Aggelos Kolaitis------------------------
C is the God’s Programming Language
Sure, thanks!On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:11 AM, neoaggelos wrote:
Hi,
‘sdl2.m4’ provides a useful macro for locating SDL in configure scripts.
However, it never bothers looking for the SDL2.framework. Given that the
official SDL development libraries release for Mac OS X comes in a
framework, I updated the sdl2.m4 from my project to also look for the
framework version of SDL (when sdl2-config and pkg-config fail, only under
Mac OS X).
Is this a change worth mirroring in the SDL sources? I can provide a patch
for sdl2.m4. I mainly wanted to see if this something other people actually
want or need.