Hi!
Could you add a download section with references to SDL_image, SDL_mixer, SDL_net and SDL_ttf to the new homepage, so one doesn’t have to search the wiki or the forum?
Regards
Sauer2
push
sauer2 wrote:
Hi!
Could you add a download section with references to SDL_image, SDL_mixer, SDL_net and SDL_ttf to the new homepage, so one doesn’t have to search the wiki or the forum?
Admittedly, this is one of the things about the old page that was rather nice: It was not hard to find middleware and libraries for SDL?both those that are “standard” extensions developed in tandem with SDL, and those that are a little less standard, but still useful.
I recall, for example, a very nice and widely used package for 1.2 that gave you access to zip files through rwops
Handy feature, that. And I bet it probably compiles either completely or nearly completely without so much as a hiccup under 2.0, being not as tightly integrated as say SDL_ttf or SDL_mixer.
2013/9/29 Joseph Carter
**
sauer2 wrote:
Hi!
Could you add a download section with references to SDL_image, SDL_mixer,
SDL_net and SDL_ttf to the new homepage, so one doesn’t have to search the
wiki or the forum?Admittedly, this is one of the things about the old page that was rather
nice: It was not hard to find middleware and libraries for SDL?both those
that are “standard” extensions developed in tandem with SDL, and those that
are a little less standard, but still useful.I recall, for example, a very nice and widely used package for 1.2 that
gave you access to zip files through rwops? Handy feature, that. And I bet
it probably compiles either completely or nearly completely without so much
as a hiccup under 2.0, being not as tightly integrated as say SDL_ttf or
SDL_mixer.
Could that possible have been a PhyicsFS wrapper?
A quick search suggests it was probably a wrapper around zziplib, but
a PhysicsFS wrapper would be quite trivial (and quite useful!)
JosephOn Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 05:06:51PM +0200, Jonas Kulla wrote:
2013/9/29 Joseph Carter <@T_Joseph_Carter>
Admittedly, this is one of the things about the old page that was rather
nice: It was not hard to find middleware and libraries for SDL?both those
that are “standard” extensions developed in tandem with SDL, and those that
are a little less standard, but still useful.I recall, for example, a very nice and widely used package for 1.2 that
gave you access to zip files through rwops? Handy feature, that. And I bet
it probably compiles either completely or nearly completely without so much
as a hiccup under 2.0, being not as tightly integrated as say SDL_ttf or
SDL_mixer.Could that possible have been a PhyicsFS wrapper?
I have this on my TODO list, but it involves completely rewriting the old
php code and I’ve got some exciting and time consuming things happening at
work this month.
If somebody wants to take a crack at it, you’re more than welcome:
http://hg.libsdl.org/sdlweb/file/defaultOn Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 3:48 AM, sauer2 wrote:
**
push
SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org
I have this on my TODO list, but it involves completely rewriting the old
php code and I’ve got some exciting and time consuming things happening at
work this month.
If somebody wants to take a crack at it, you’re more than welcome:
http://hg.libsdl.org/sdlweb/file/default
Just out of curiosity, what’s wrong with that old code?On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Sam Lantinga wrote:
–
Ga?tan de Menten