From 758dab45af3694c4f085da0857dfa87c4ecba68a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Ryan C. Gordon" <[EMAIL REDACTED]>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 18:38:30 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] properties: Fixed a typo in a comment.
(cherry picked from commit 5b5713b9555b9a5409124f7650be2c0f6e816d0f)
---
src/SDL_properties.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/SDL_properties.c b/src/SDL_properties.c
index 254d25c46a151..4c67b5d0b5bec 100644
--- a/src/SDL_properties.c
+++ b/src/SDL_properties.c
@@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ void SDL_DestroyProperties(SDL_PropertiesID props)
{
if (props) {
// this can't just use RemoveFromHashTable with SDL_FreeProperties as the destructor, because
- // other destructors under this might cause use to attempt a recursive lock on SDL_properties,
+ // other destructors under this might cause us to attempt a recursive lock on SDL_properties,
// which isn't allowed with rwlocks. So manually look it up and remove/free it.
SDL_Properties *properties = NULL;
if (SDL_FindInHashTable(SDL_properties, (const void *)(uintptr_t)props, (const void **)&properties)) {