From 9f8157f42cc0351833c030febe8a559719c875bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: SDL Wiki Bot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:29:19 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Sync SDL3 wiki -> header
[ci skip]
---
include/SDL3/SDL_asyncio.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/SDL3/SDL_asyncio.h b/include/SDL3/SDL_asyncio.h
index 24f9e43bacf3a..6ed692f382211 100644
--- a/include/SDL3/SDL_asyncio.h
+++ b/include/SDL3/SDL_asyncio.h
@@ -80,7 +80,8 @@
* some amount of resources, but it is not an overwhelming cost. Do not make a
* queue for each task, however. It is better to put many tasks into a single
* queue. They will be reported in order of completion, not in the order they
- * were submitted, so it doesn't generally matter what order tasks are started.
+ * were submitted, so it doesn't generally matter what order tasks are
+ * started.
*
* One async i/o queue can be shared by multiple threads, or one thread can
* have more than one queue, but the most efficient way--if ruthless