I forgot to tell you… when I compile anything using SDL, I get:
/usr/lib/libc.so: warning: this program uses gets(), which is unsafe.
/usr/lib/libc.so: WARNING! setkey(3) not present in the system!
/usr/lib/libc.so: WARNING! des_setkey(3) not present in the system!
/usr/lib/libc.so: WARNING! encrypt(3) not present in the system!
/usr/lib/libc.so: WARNING! des_cipher(3) not present in the system!
/usr/lib/libc.so: warning: this program uses f_prealloc(), which is
stupid.
I’m a bit confused about this myself. I run FreeBSD 5.0 and I installed a port called sdl-12, which installed SDL 1.1?? I don’t use SDL for very much, so I didn’t complain, I just thought it was a little odd… Is this supposed to be like this? Any other FreeBSD users out there want to tell me if I did something wrong??
Mik Mifflin
Dog sex at noon taxes godOn Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:39:44 -0800 Bill Kendrick wrote:
It’s come to my attention that the latest version of SDL available for
FreeBSD is 1.1 (which I believe doesn’t even have the ‘sdl-config’ tool).
Is the porter out here, and willing to bring it up to date?
I’m a bit confused about this myself. I run FreeBSD 5.0 and I installed a port called sdl-12, which installed SDL 1.1?? I don’t use SDL for very much, so I didn’t complain, I just thought it was a little odd… Is this supposed to be like this? Any other FreeBSD users out there want to tell me if I did something wrong??
No, I think it’s really SDL 1.2, but for historical purposes the package is
called sdl1.1. Check the output of sdl-config* --version (it’s not named
sdl-config, but I forget exactly what numbers are on the end)
See ya,
-Sam Lantinga, Software Engineer, Blizzard Entertainment
I’m developing on Windows with SDL v1.2.5, can someone tell me on which
platforms the fullscreen toggle is possible or not ?
Thanks,
Fabrice Louis.>From: Sam Lantinga
Reply-To: sdl at libsdl.org
To: sdl at libsdl.org
Subject: Re: [SDL] FreeBSD
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 09:38:26 -0800
I’m a bit confused about this myself. I run FreeBSD 5.0 and I installed
a port called sdl-12, which installed SDL 1.1?? I don’t use SDL for very
much, so I didn’t complain, I just thought it was a little odd… Is this
supposed to be like this? Any other FreeBSD users out there want to tell
me if I did something wrong??
No, I think it’s really SDL 1.2, but for historical purposes the package is
called sdl1.1. Check the output of sdl-config* --version (it’s not named
sdl-config, but I forget exactly what numbers are on the end)
See ya,
-Sam Lantinga, Software Engineer, Blizzard Entertainment
I’m a bit confused about this myself. I run FreeBSD 5.0 and I
installed a port called sdl-12, which installed SDL 1.1?? I don’t use
SDL for very much, so I didn’t complain, I just thought it was a
little odd… Is this supposed to be like this? Any other FreeBSD
users out there want to tell me if I did something wrong??
Er, scratched my head as well. Fwiw FreeBSD4.7 RELEASE ports/devel/sdl12
results in (/usr/local/bin) ‘sdl11-config’. Headers end up in
(usr/local) “SDL11” and libs in (usr/local) “SDL1.1.*” but the version
number returned is in fact “1.2.4”.
Perhaps a lapse on my part, the sdl tests don’t get built by ports. In
any case the odd non-ported app can be a pita to configure. The
SDL_CONFIG (=/usr/local/bin/sdl11-config) environmental and/or a
suitable ‘sdl-config’ symlink can rescue the situation: methinks one of
the afore-mentioned sorted the sdl test glitch out for those who want to
compile them.On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 19:48:33 -0500 Mik Mifflin wrote:
