Mouse on Windows still broken

hardcoder · October 14, 2010, 8:39am

Is there any reason why this is still not fixed you Windows haters.

Please, please, please apply / push / merge a patch submitted here long time ago so that all of us (non windows haters) wouldn’t have to do that locally after every pull from the repo.

Thanks in advance

Kenneth_Bull · October 14, 2010, 10:12am

Is there any reason why this is still not fixed you Windows haters.

Please, please, please apply / push / merge a patch submitted here long
time ago so that all of us (non windows haters) wouldn’t have to do that
locally after every pull from the repo.

Thanks in advance [image: Wink]

You might want to mention which bug in particular you want fixed. Maybe
even link to the appropriate entry in bugzilla.

Anyway, “Windows hater” == “sane”, some of us just use it anyway.On 14 October 2010 04:39, hardcoder wrote:

hardcoder · October 14, 2010, 10:43am

Sorry, you are right of course. I don’t know why rest of my post isn’t here.

I am relating to this issue:

http://forums.libsdl.org/viewtopic.php?t=6485&highlight=mouse+events

this thread has patch posted.

PS: So “no windows haters” == “insane”?

Kenneth Bull wrote:> On 14 October 2010 04:39, hardcoder <@hardcoder (@hardcoder)> wrote:

  Is there any reason why this is still not fixed you Windows haters.
Please, please, please apply / push / merge a patch submitted here long time ago so that all of us (non windows haters) wouldn’t have to do that locally after every pull from the repo.

Thanks in advance
You might want to mention which bug in particular you want fixed.? Maybe even link to the appropriate entry in bugzilla.

Anyway, “Windows hater” == “sane”, some of us just use it anyway.

Jeff_Post · October 14, 2010, 2:25pm

Not necessarily. The vast majority of Windows users are ignorant of anything
beyond where to point and click. Like children, they just don’t know any
better.

jpOn Thursday 14 October 2010 03:43, hardcoder wrote:

PS: So “no windows haters” == “insane”?

hardcoder · October 14, 2010, 7:31pm

I made a joke guys, relax.

Windows haters have no sense of humor.

(again a joke)

Jeff Post wrote:> On Thursday 14 October 2010 03:43, hardcoder wrote:

PS: So “no windows haters” == “insane”?

Not necessarily. The vast majority of Windows users are ignorant of anything
beyond where to point and click. Like children, they just don’t know any
better.

jp

SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org

Kenneth_Bull · October 15, 2010, 12:53am

Sorry, you are right of course. I don’t know why rest of my post isn’t
here.

I am relating to this issue:

SDL :: View topic - Right mouse button event

this thread has patch posted.

Bug report is here:

github.com/libsdl-org/SDL

Missing mouse events under Windows

opened 10:16PM - 10 Feb 21 UTC

closed 10:16PM - 10 Feb 21 UTC

SDLBugzilla

# This bug report was migrated from our old Bugzilla tracker. These attachments… are available in the static archive: * [Patch for win32 mouse events (win32mouseevents.patch, application/octet-stream, 2010-08-17 17:09:16 +0000, 1450 bytes)](https://bugzilla.libsdl.org/attachment.cgi?id=535) **Reported in version:** HG 2.0 **Reported for operating system, platform:** Windows (XP), x86 # Comments on the original bug report: On 2010-08-17 17:09:16 +0000, John Wilson wrote: > Created attachment 535 > Patch for win32 mouse events > > The are no event handlers for the middle mouse button, right mouse buttons, and mouse wheel in the latest HG revision 4636. It has been like this for 3 months. I made a patch for this, though I'm not sure if the Xbutton or mouse wheel code is "correct" by your standards. On 2011-01-06 21:54:00 +0000, Rainer Deyke wrote: > This bug renders SDL 1.3 unusable for me. I'm going back to SDL 1.2 until this is fixed. On 2011-01-07 12:42:48 +0000, Nathaniel J Fries wrote: > This still exists in the newest revision. The patch offered by Mr. Wilson seems acceptable, and I have verified that it resolves the issue (at least for the right button -- although I never had any doubt of that anyway). On 2011-01-19 22:38:18 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote: > Thank you very much for your patch for SDL 1.3! > > Do you give me permission to release your code with SDL 1.3 and future > versions of SDL under both the LGPL and a closed-source commercial > license? On 2011-01-19 22:40:20 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote: > *** Bug 1093 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** On 2011-01-20 23:30:39 +0000, John Wilson wrote: > (In reply to comment # 3) > > Thank you very much for your patch for SDL 1.3! > > > > Do you give me permission to release your code with SDL 1.3 and future > > versions of SDL under both the LGPL and a closed-source commercial > > license? > > Of course. Why would I post it here if I wouldn't allow you to do that? :p On 2011-01-21 01:13:39 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote: > Thanks! > http://hg.libsdl.org/SDL/rev/28003ba91f57

Look’s like Ryan Gordon’s supposed to be working on it…

Ryan, you still alive?On 14 October 2010 06:43, hardcoder wrote:

hardcoder · October 20, 2010, 11:06am

[/quote]

Ryan, you still alive?

[/quote]

I guess not