Could whoever’s sending this PGP sig as an attachment kindly stop doing so
please?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: 1024D/DCF9DAB3 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
iEYEARECAAYFAjt6mTwACgkQj/fXo9z52rM9KwCgsKqvwlven/NPK51eua/XTf8I
6vMAoIKl/iYVRISar9ztvphTH4QUVz6Y
=I/mD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Could whoever’s sending this PGP sig as an attachment kindly stop doing so
please?
Whats your problem with PGP signatures?
Want to write fake posts with his identity ? 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: 1024D/DCF9DAB3 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3iEYEARECAAYFAjt6mTwACgkQj/fXo9z52rM9KwCgsKqvwlven/NPK51eua/XTf8I
6vMAoIKl/iYVRISar9ztvphTH4QUVz6Y
=I/mD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
SDL mailing list
SDL at libsdl.org
http://www.libsdl.org/mailman/listinfo/sdl
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed…
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: http://lists.libsdl.org/pipermail/sdl-libsdl.org/attachments/20010815/1638c35d/attachment.pgpOn Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:53:18AM -0700, Manny wrote:
No problem with PGP sigs themselves, of course. It’s just that by sending
them as attachments I’m amassing a collection of them. I don’t mind
getting the occasion patch or test program that I’m not particularly
interested in, but the recent clutter of PGP sig files to delete each mail
check is getting annoying.
At 09:18 PM 8/15/2001 +0200, you wrote:>On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:53:18AM -0700, Manny wrote:
Could whoever’s sending this PGP sig as an attachment kindly stop doing so
please?Whats your problem with PGP signatures?
Want to write fake posts with his identity ?
Whats your problem with PGP signatures?=20
Want to write fake posts with his identity ?
No, but some mail clients (like mine) are crashing with them.
Thank you!
Andreas Podgurski
Whats your problem with PGP signatures?=20
Want to write fake posts with his identity ?
No, but some mail clients (like mine) are crashing with them.
Its probably not a good idea to flood the ml with a discussion about this and the best would be a policy decision by the list-administrator -
but I think a buggy mailclient is a bad reason to stop an afaik completely standards conforming practice.
The same goes for a mailclient that forces you to separately delete an attachment or whatever the problem was …On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:55:54PM +0200, Andreas Podgurski wrote:
Thank you!
Andreas Podgurski
SDL mailing list
SDL at libsdl.org
http://www.libsdl.org/mailman/listinfo/sdl