Message-ID:
<1367010768.33226.YahooMailNeo at web122502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=“iso-8859-1”Actually, if it’s all about the memory managers, whatever program you’re
using SDL in is going to have its own malloc anyway.? (Assuming you’re
writing from a native code language, at least.)? Why not have a
SDL_RegisterMemoryManager() function, where you pass in a set of function
pointers, for malloc, realloc, and free?
That is a good idea. Perhaps something like this:
/* Arbitrary .c file /
static void malloc_data, realloc_data, free_data;
static void (malloc_function)( void / Data /, size_t );
static void (realloc_function)( void / Data /, void, size_t );
static void (free_function)( void / Data /, void );
void* SDL_malloc( size_t size )
{
}> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mason Wheeler
To: “sdl at lists.libsdl.org”
Subject: Re: [SDL] Link SDL2 statically with Visual C++ 2012