SDL_ListModes() undocumented behaviour

SDL Development
1

Using SDL with XFree86 under Linux, I’ve noticed that SDL_ListModes()
can return -1. It seems to do so in the case where any dimensions would
be acceptable.
The docs mention returning NULL (if no modes are available with the
specified pixelformat) but not -1.

Is this an intended (but as-yet undocumented) behaviour?
Or is it just an extra feature of the X11 code?

Ben.–
Ben Campbell (Antipodean Straggler)
Programmer, Creature Labs
ben.campbell at creaturelabs.com
www.creaturelabs.com

2

Using SDL with XFree86 under Linux, I’ve noticed that SDL_ListModes()
can return -1. It seems to do so in the case where any dimensions would
be acceptable.
The docs mention returning NULL (if no modes are available with the
specified pixelformat) but not -1.

Is this an intended (but as-yet undocumented) behaviour?
Or is it just an extra feature of the X11 code?

Neither, it’s indented but misdocumented. The html docs say:

 Returns NULL if there are no dimensions available for a
 particular format, or if any dimension is okay
 for the given format.

but this should probably be

 Returns NULL if there are no dimensions available for a
 particular format, or (SDL_Rect **)-1 if any dimension is okay
 for the given format.

I imagine other windowed targets behave similarly.

(Martin, remember to fix this in the new docs, please!)

3

but this should probably be

Returns NULL if there are no dimensions available for a
particular format, or (SDL_Rect **)-1 if any dimension is okay
for the given format.

I imagine other windowed targets behave similarly.

(Martin, remember to fix this in the new docs, please!)
Yes mother!

:slight_smile:

MartinOn Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Mattias Engdegard wrote:

Bother! said Pooh, as Quark cheated him.

4

Ben Campbell wrote:

Using SDL with XFree86 under Linux, I’ve noticed that SDL_ListModes()
can return -1. It seems to do so in the case where any dimensions would
be acceptable.
The docs mention returning NULL (if no modes are available with the
specified pixelformat) but not -1.

Is this an intended (but as-yet undocumented) behaviour?
Or is it just an extra feature of the X11 code?

for greates documentation see SDL headers–
Linux = "The Tecnological Evolution"
Linux + Overclock = “The Art of Racing”